I’ve noticed that misrepresentations like these are often accompanied by citations of the Darwin-lobbying group National Center for Science Education.
From the headline of the piece you might think you were reading some online tabloid.
BIO-Complexity is not the first journal to be founded to advance a controversial case.
When establishment pillars like these finally get fed up and speak out against the weaponizing of science rhetoric, that’s a welcome and very healthy sign.
Some organisms cause harm, but are well designed nonetheless. That’s all intelligent design can say.
Forensic analysis is ripe for abuse if scientists are careless with the design filter.
The concept of a “DNA Code” has a long pedigree in genetics. But what about the other nucleic acids?
At Middlebury, hysterical insistence on uniformity of thought drew a furious mob of students.
The message, of course, is that humans are not the least bit exceptional.
What is etched in the landscape of Amazonia? Something strange and unexpected has come to light.