Applying isn’t hard, there are tracks in the sciences and humanities, and scholarships are available.
Information-rich functional machines don’t pop into existence merely because their presence would be advantageous.
This is what happens when journals and media disqualify critical analysis of Darwinian explanations by fiat.
A while back I was sitting across from a candidate who had been studying hard for his oral certifying exam in anesthesiology.
On a trip to Northeast campuses, I had the privilege of speaking to students about the evidence for design in nature.
The headline is a pro-evolution gloss unwarranted by the findings.
For this memorable event in Greater Philadelphia, speakers will include Doug Axe, Jonathan Wells, John West, and Brian Miller.
The concept of a “DNA Code” has a long pedigree in genetics. But what about the other nucleic acids?
Mindless adherence to stereotypes is one of the most effective weapons in Darwinism’s arsenal.
This brings the question of supposed “Junk DNA” home — home, literally, to your family’s dinner table.