Author: Casey Luskin
Polar Bear Seminar: The APOB Gene and Damaging Mutations
Michael Behe correctly interpreted a paper by Liu et al. and followed its methodology, whereas his critics, Lents and Hunt, did not.
Polar Bear Seminar: Why Behe Is Right
Starting today, you’re invited to sit back and enjoy a five-part series on polar bear genes in light of Behe’s thesis in Darwin Devolves.
From Swamidass on Chloroquine Resistance, a Response that Doesn’t Respond
Swamidass’s response doesn’t address our main arguments, but he indicates he is impressed by what Darwinian mechanisms accomplished in generating chloroquine resistance.
On Chloroquine Resistance, Nathan Lents Severely Misrepresents Behe’s Arguments
If you’re going to engage with an individual you disagree with, it’s important to know what that person argues and to state it accurately.
Perplexing: Michael Behe’s Critics Falsely Claim He Ignores Exaptation
Writing in the journal Science, reviewers Lents, Swamidass, and Lenski make a very specific, clear, strong, and unambiguous claim.