Author: Casey Luskin
What a Darwin Advocate’s Response to the ENCODE Project Tells Us about the Darwin Debate
The consensus of molecular biologists — people who actually study how the genome works — now believe that the idea of “junk DNA” is essentially wrong.
Junk No More: ENCODE Project Nature Paper Finds “Biochemical Functions for 80% of the Genome”
A stunning vindication of intelligent design’s prediction that the genome, far from being cluttered with functionless garbage, will turn out to have mass functionality.
McBride Misstates My Arguments in Science and Human Origins
Paul McBride claims that I am arguing there is some kind of a “conspiracy” where paleoanthropologists willfully conspire to hide the truth from the public.
Huffington Post Author Invents Claims about Explore Evolution and Pop-Paleontology
Some critics find it easier to attack a book by inventing claims about what it says than by reading the book and responding to what’s actually in it.
Read Your References Carefully: Paul McBride’s Prized Citation on Skull-Sizes Supports My Thesis, Not His
There’s a reason why McBride focuses his response so heavily on skull sizes — it’s a rare characteristic for which there’s some consistent kind of a trajectory over time.