This goes way beyond wishful thinking. There really does seem to be a transition going on, a veil of ignorance and denial pierced by Nagel’s book.
The final burst of insight was delivered to James Watson in the morning, February 28, 1953.
Evolutionists wrongly argue that ID can’t be true because some designs are not optimal. But there might be a perfectly intelligent reason for some suboptimal designs in nature.
Kenneth Miller seems to assume that if a designer had anything to do with the origin of species, then we should see evidence in the fossil record that someone waved a magic wand.
Benner et al.‘s ambitious task was to address some of the most compelling reasons cited by origin-of-life researchers who reject the RNA-world model.
With the evolution of the field of epigenetics, we are watching a new paradigm unfold with far-reaching implications for the question of Darwin v. design.
You may remember how Dr. Behe’s visit to Toronto back in November prompted a fit of contempt from local biochemist Larry Moran.
From the annals of peculiar nature stories comes this news item, seemingly designed to distress the Jewish mother in all of us.
Yes, that’s the brother of the late prominent atheist Christopher Hitchens.
The proposed Missouri legislation is entirely different from academic freedom bills, which we do support.