The phrase refers to a willed ignorance and refusal to come to terms with complex realities.
What if these researchers do succeed some day in improving on life’s code? Would it support the case for materialism?
New “genome-wide evidence that jumping genes may shape when a gene is turned on or off in stem cells.”
The moderator’s opening presentation was excellent. He recounted how philosophers of science have largely rejected demarcation criteria.
The Darwin Brigade is gearing up for a fight in the state.
Did you think they would relinquish Lewis as a mascot no matter how thoroughly documented the case — that he was a Darwin doubter on key points — actually is?
Philosophers of science have long debated the precise definition of science.
The proper place for mulling intelligent design is in the labs and lecture halls that host the scientific community and its activity.
Here’s a dark spin on Darwinian theory that I didn’t expect to come across in the Wall Street Journal.
Viewers may recognize a familiar face in the Q&A, as Stephen Meyer himself weighs in with his thoughts on the talk.