Month: October 2012
Paul Johnson’s Darwin: A Review
Johnson’s work is not strictly speaking a biography; it is a historian’s assessment of modern evolutionary theory and the man behind it.
Whale Imitates People, Person Imitates Whales
If we were peer-reviewing the article in Current Biology, our review would consist of one three-letter interjection.
From BBC Two, Secret Universe: The Hidden Life of the Cell
Check out this spectacular cellular visualization.
Pseudoscience, Eugenics, and Demarcation
Look here: A physicist who seems to understand the demarcation problem proceeds to demarcate “pseudoscience” on his own authority. Alex Wellerstein reviewed a book on pseudoscience that explicitly warns about the challenge of differentiating between science and pseudoscience. Wellerstein, of the Center for the History of Physics, American Institute of Physics in Maryland, wrote in the Oct. 12 issue of Science this summary of what Michael D. Gordin said about the “demarcation problem” in his new book, The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe. Velikovsky’s cosmic catastrophism is, for Gordin, also a case study on the famously intractable demarcation problem, the difficulty of coming up with firm criteria for what separates science from nonscience, or Read More ›
Upward and Onward with Peer Review
It’s fun to report, then, the hoaxing of a mathematics journal, Advances in Pure Mathematics.