An linguistic evolutionary fable unravels.
In the absence of a common designer, the presumption of human dignity and quality has no anchor — it’s just wishful thinking.
An ID critic offers a list of features from life and nature that he says show “unintelligent design” but in fact are best classified as illustrating “undesirable design.”
In the hands of Darwinists and other enforcers, the word “skeptic” now designates the exact opposite of what it should seem to mean.
An absurd false dilemma.
It’s time for a little reality check here: origin-of-life theorists need to explain how a myriad of complex proteins and features arose and self-assembled into a self-replicating life-form by unguided processes.
Climate skeptics and Darwin doubters now have a common opponent, and we’re going to be linked and attacked in many of the same ways.
“As a physicist, I should like to critically object that this model has not been supported by an affirmative estimate of probabilities.”
Krauss’s A Universe from Nothing is a superior and accessible rehashing of the concept of the “landscape,” also known as the “multiverse.”
You are witnessing a real-time scientific trial. (And they say intelligent-design advocates don’t do those!) Here we go.