Culture & Ethics Icon Culture & Ethics
Medicine Icon Medicine

Taking the Intimacy Out of Family Creation

Taking the Intimacy Out of Family Creation.jpg

The intellectual class drives our public policy discussions. Perhaps that is why there is such a push for eugenics in reproduction.

The latest example comes from Stanford bioethicist Hank Greely, writing in The Guardian. Greely enthusiastically predicts that future children will routinely come into being in the lab rather the bedroom. Better, from his utilitarian perspective, parents will quality-control their children — discarding embryos deemed of lesser eugenic value.

From “Who Needs Sex to Make Babies?“:

Stem cell technologies will bypass egg harvesting. Instead we will take a woman’s skin cells; turn them into so-called “induced pluripotent stem cells” (cells very similar to the famous embryonic stem cells but made from living people); turn those cells into eggs, and mature the eggs in the lab…

The result will be easy PGD [pre-implantation genetic diagnosis]. A couple who wants children will visit a clinic — he will leave a sperm sample; she will leave a skin sample. A week or two later, the prospective parents will receive information on 100 embryos created from their cells, telling them what the embryos’ genomes predict about their future. Prospective parents will then be asked what they want to be told about each embryo — serious early onset genetic diseases, other diseases, cosmetic traits, behaviours, and, easiest but important to many: gender. Then they will select which embryos to move into the womb for possible pregnancy and birth.

By then, perhaps we’ll have the artificial womb, so no morning sickness or interference with normal routine. And so much for romance. So much for unconditional love of children. So much for family creation as our most intimate endeavor.

The quest for perfection in procreation is ultimately self-destructive. Think of the kind of people who might not have been born if subjected as embryos to such a quality-control inspection:

  • Abraham Lincoln, tall, homely, perhaps with a genetic disease.
  • Mother Teresa, diminutive, obsessive about religion.
  • Vincent van Gogh, clearly suffering from depressive disease.
  • Woody Guthrie, Huntington’s disease.
  • Ludwig van Beethoven, early-onset deafness.
  • The people who will never be famous but who have inspired us all by struggling against congenitally caused difficulties.

Once we transform family creation into an industrial technique, we shouldn’t be surprised that dehumanization and eugenic quality-control become part of the package.

Image credit: © Boggy / Dollar Photo Club.

Cross-posted at Human Exceptionalism.

Wesley J. Smith

Chair and Senior Fellow, Center on Human Exceptionalism
Wesley J. Smith is Chair and Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism. Wesley is a contributor to National Review and is the author of 14 books, in recent years focusing on human dignity, liberty, and equality. Wesley has been recognized as one of America’s premier public intellectuals on bioethics by National Journal and has been honored by the Human Life Foundation as a “Great Defender of Life” for his work against suicide and euthanasia. Wesley’s most recent book is Culture of Death: The Age of “Do Harm” Medicine, a warning about the dangers to patients of the modern bioethics movement.

Share

Tags

Health & Wellnesssciencetechnology