Oops. They Dumped the Original Data. You'll Just Have to Take Their Word for It.
From the Sunday Times in London:
SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
The UEA's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.
The world's leading climate scientists now admit that the raw data they used to generate the graphs that are the basis for a proposed restructuring of world governance and economy doesn't exist anymore. 'Umm, teacher, my polar bear ate my raw data...'.
The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals -- stored on paper and magnetic tape -- were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building
"Hey, Phil, we're running out of space to put the grant money. Make some room-- dump out that stuff in the corner..."
The admission follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and received by Professor Phil Jones, the CRU's director. In them he discusses thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data.
In a statement on its website, the CRU said: "We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data."
The value added to the data is the 80 billion dollars that we've flushed down the toilet on this 'research'.
The CRU is the world's leading centre for reconstructing past climate and temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible.
Oh. I thought that 'other scientists examining exactly how data was compiled'-- replication of results-- was supposed to happen before the scientific conclusion was accepted as true.
Roger Pielke, professor of environmental studies at Colorado University, discovered data had been lost when he asked for original records. "The CRU is basically saying, 'Trust us'. So much for settling questions and resolving debates with science," he said.
But global warming is an existential threat to the planet, so why waste time trying to reproduce the results. Prince Charles says that we've only got 96 months left to save the planet, and that was 5 months ago.
Jones was not in charge of the CRU when the data were thrown away in the 1980s, a time when climate change was seen as a less pressing issue. The lost material was used to build the databases that have been his life's work, showing how the world has warmed by 0.8C over the past 157 years.
He and his colleagues say this temperature rise is "unequivocally" linked to greenhouse gas emissions generated by humans. Their findings are one of the main pieces of evidence used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which says global warming is a threat to humanity.
New definition of "settled science": science that there's no way in hell you can check.