Meyer Has CNN Op-ed for Anniversary of Darwin's <i>Origin</i>: Pro-Darwin consensus doesn't rule out intelligent design - Evolution News & Views

Evolution News and Views (ENV) provides original reporting and analysis about the debate over intelligent design and evolution, including breaking news about scientific research.

Evolution News and Views
EVOLUTION NEWS & VIEWS
 

Meyer Has CNN Op-ed for Anniversary of Darwin's Origin: Pro-Darwin consensus doesn't rule out intelligent design

As part of the recognition of this being the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin's On The Origin of Species, CNN.com today published this piece by CSC Director Stephen C. Meyer.

Pro-Darwin consensus doesn't rule out intelligent design
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Stephen Meyer says there are scientific reasons to doubt consensus about Darwin's theory
  • Meyer: Fossil record challenges idea that organisms evolved from a single ancestor
  • Meyer: There is compelling scientific evidence of actual intelligent design

    While we officially celebrate the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" on November 24, celebrations of Darwin's legacy have actually been building in intensity for several years. Darwin is not just an important 19th century scientific thinker. Increasingly, he is a cultural icon.

    Darwin is the subject of adulation that teeters on the edge of hero worship, expressed in everything from scholarly seminars and lecture series to best-selling new atheist tracts like those by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. The atheists claim that Darwin disproved once and for all the argument for intelligent design from nature.

    And that of course is why he remains hugely controversial. A Zogby poll commissioned by the Discovery Institute this year found that 52 percent of Americans agree "the development of life was guided by intelligent design." Those who are not scientists may wonder if they have a right to entertain skepticism about Darwinian theory.

    We are told that a consensus of scientists supporting the theory means that Darwinian evolution is no longer subject to debate. But does it ever happen that a seemingly broad consensus of scientific expertise turns out to be wrong, generated by an ideologically motivated stampeding of opinion?

    Read the rest here.