Dallas Morning News Offers Alternate Reality on Texas Science Standards - Evolution News & Views

Evolution News and Views (ENV) provides original reporting and analysis about the debate over intelligent design and evolution, including breaking news about scientific research.

Evolution News and Views
Texas NEWS
 

Dallas Morning News Offers Alternate Reality on Texas Science Standards

One has to wonder whether the Dallas Morning News reporter even attended today's meeting of the Texas State Board of Education. It's hard to tell from the garbled account the paper just published, which pretty much claims that the evolution dogmatists won everything. Of course, the truth is almost exactly the opposite. The article is a classic example of either sloppy or selective reporting. For example, the piece talks about the removal of the "strengths and weaknesses provision" from the Texas science standards, but neglects to mention the adoption of even stronger language that requires students to "critique" and examine "all sides of scientific evidence"! The article likewise talks about the removal of Chairman Don McElroy's extra provisions on common ancestry and natural selection, but garbles the fact that the two "compromise" provisions later adopted about the fossil record and the complexity of the cell were offered as substitutes for McElroy's earlier provisions--and McElroy praised these substitutes for covering much of the same material he had proposed. Most egregiously, the article fails to mention that the final standards preserve amendments added in January requiring students to "analyze and evaluate" the evidence for major evolutionary claims such as natural selection, common ancestry, and mutations. The new "analyze and evaluate" language is a huge change from the one-sided evolution standards in the current Texas science standards and may well be the most significant revision adopted by the Board. The article also fails to report the addition of a new standard dealing with the origin of life in the high school biology standards. It's shoddy reporting like this that helps fuel the distrust many Americans feel toward the traditional newsmedia.