If You Have Laws, Don't You Have to Have Punish Lawbreakers?
The Advocate today gives a big hip-hip-hooray for Darwin's "process." They worry that the public doesn't accept Darwinian evolutionary claims to explain the complex diversity of life and the universe. Must be that they just don't understand. Their solution?
Perhaps the "law of evolution" would be more easily understood by the public than the "theory" of evolution.It's interesting that evolution is so solid, so proven, that it will only survive if it is declared a law. When evolution is the law of the land, what will happen then to those who dissent?