« Philly Inquirer Associated Press Article Has GOOD Definition of Intelligent Design | Main | Judge Jones Follows ACLU, Ignores Contrary Facts »

Klinghoffer Responds to Dover Intelligent Design Opinion at NRO

David Klinghoffer begins:

Tuesday's ruling by a federal judge in Pennsylvania, disparaging intelligent design as a religion-based and therefore false science, raises an important question: If ID is bogus because many of its theorists have religious beliefs to which the controversial critique of Darwinism lends support, then what should we say about Darwinism itself? After all, many proponents of Darwinian evolution have philosophical beliefs to which Darwin lends support.

The full essay is here.

Posted by Jonathan Witt on December 21, 2005 9:27 AM |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/253

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Klinghoffer Responds to Dover Intelligent Design Opinion at NRO:

» Supernatural Causation and the Argument that ID is not a Science from Daily Phil
In his “Dover’s Darwinist Judge Rules Against Competing Theory of Intelligent Design,” Jonathan Witt, a fellow at the Center for Science and Culture, the think tank that has become the intellectual center of the current Intelligent Design (h... [Read More]

Tracked on December 23, 2005 9:58 AM

The misreporting of the evolution issue is one key reason for this site. Unfortunately, much of the news coverage has been sloppy, inaccurate, and in some cases, overtly biased. Evolution News & Views presents analysis of that coverage, as well as original reporting that accurately delivers information about the current state of the debate over Darwinian evolution. Click here to read more.